|
On 6/21/05, Joe Pluta <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Steve Richter > > > > Why would an enterprise decide to use MySql instead of SQLServer for > > .NET applications? The cost per employee using sql server must be a > > tiny fraction of what that employee costs the employer per year. > > Arguably, using sql server will increase the productivity of the > > employee because the application software will have more > > functionality, was easier for the programmer to develop. > > I get a kick out of this. Replace a few words and phrases, and you get > this: > > Why would an enterprise decide to use Windows instead of an iSeries to > store their business logic? The cost per employee using an iSeries > server must be a tiny fraction of what that employee costs the employer > per year. Using an iSeries server will increase the productivity of the > employee because the data is more accessible, has more tools for the > programmer to develop with, is more secure, more reliable, easier to > backup and costs less to maintain. > > (Note that you can still use Windows to develop your thick client > applications if you so desire, you just don't store your database and > business logic there.) I'd say people are voting with there wallets on this one and not following your suggestion. > > Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.