|
That reminds me. We've lost the Lotus Notes battle as well. We're transitioning off Notes/Domino to M$. That means re-developing all of our collaborative apps so they too can run in the M$ world or more appropriately on the Internet. Don't get me started on this one though. We fought that fight for several years until corporate finally said "DO IT", just because all of the other divisions were M$. Ron Adams "Ingvaldson, Scott" <SIngvaldson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 05/27/2005 12:07 PM Please respond to Midrange Systems Technical Discussion To: <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> cc: Subject: RE: Help me Justify iSeries Ron - I should add that we've just finished migrating our test and production Lotus Notes environments from old (needing raplacement) NT servers to our 810 iSeries at basically no cost other than my time. Regards, Scott Ingvaldson iSeries System Administrator GuideOne Insurance Group -----Original Message----- date: Fri, 27 May 2005 09:58:38 -0500 from: ron_adams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx subject: RE: Help me Justify iSeries Thanks everybody for some great comments. Unfortunately, I haven't seen anything really that I haven't already said to my boss. I've been on the midrange platform since '89 and happen to think it's solid and would not even dream of running a business class app on Wintel. But, the impression here by upper management is that this platform is costly in hardware, software and maintenance. And for the most part their right. I know that it's a solid and secure platform and maintaining it is a piece of cake. But, I just can't convince management that the money spent is worth it. For the record we're a "smallish" shop. We have 5 Wintel (Dell) servers at HQ running Win2K and 2003. We run Lotus Notes here and at each of our remote sites on Wintel (Dell) servers that also serve as file servers for each of those locations. Total of 11 Wintel servers which were probably around $4500 each ($49500). The staff is comprised of myself, and another guy. I handle midrange ERP systems which includes the i5 and an older HP3000. The other guy handles the Wintel servers and network/pc support (he stays very busy), but I back him up sometimes as does my boss. We've loaded SQL server on a couple of the Wintel machines as well as ESSbase. If you look at the figures from a 3-year standpoint, the Wintel servers, which have been solid for the most part with very minimal down-time over the last year, the Wintel server(s) win. I know that if we switch to a Wintel platform for our business ERP, the costs are going to go up, as we'll need some more servers with more disk, CPU and memory but still it won't equal the cost of the iSeries and all of its apps and hardware, plus maintenance. Sorry guys, but from a cost (only) standpoint the iSeries just can't compete, and that's where my boss and upper management are. Ron Adams
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.