× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. April 2005

RE: 64 bit Windows...

How's this for one:

I forwarded one of the emails in this thread (actually your reply to Joe) to
Malcolm (Haines) and suggested waiting awhile and letting MS/Intel/AMD do
the blabbing about 64-bit and tell the world and then IBM roll out the
128-bit. Maybe even 96-bit first and then a couple of weeks/months latter do
128-bit to REALLY hammer home how ahead of those folks IBM is ? :-) 

Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Dixon
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 11:21 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: 64 bit Windows...

Chuck

It certainly is supposed to be relatively easy for IBM to go to 128 
bits, but 64 will do for now.  We need to find a way of getting them 
going.  Others have tried in the past but failed.  Any bright ideas?

Rob

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.