|
I think it is too bad that discussions have to degenerate to this all the time. I am working at a bit of a disadvantage here since I cannot see the actualy discussion taking place but I still cannot help comment. I have nothing against RPG-CGI. It could be a good solution, even the right solution, in a lot of situations. As for scalability, I think the problem is that it is hard to define what that term means. I think when the Internet world decided that CGI was not scalable the problem is that they were defining the problem on the eBay/Amazon.com type scale of traffic. I doubt that either CGI or JSP would have trouble handling the kind of traffic that most business apps generate, even in large organizations. What I prefer about the JSP solution is all of the options it gives you, such as running the business rules server and application server on separate physical machines. You can sort of do this with RPG-CGI, but when you do the RPG coding gets a lot more difficult and you are no longer using RPG for what it is best at. As for WebSphere, I have problems with all of the people that want to bash it. Installing WebSphere involes running RSTLICPGM. Is that hard? Configuring WebSphere is the matter of running a wizard with almost no questions other than a name to use. Is that hard? Understanding every aspect of J2EE is far from easy, but you have very little need to understand even a little bit of J2EE. I do not see how basic JSP is any more difficult to learn than Net.Data which everyone seems to love so much. Start there and learn stuff as you need to. As for any attacks on my credibility, all I will say is that I am not "pitching WebSphere" I am defending it and I think that is a difference. I have not criticized anyone or their choices, I am simply asking that others do the same. If you love RPG-CGI, fine. Go tell the world about it and how great it is and how you use it. But in doing so why is it necessary to spread FUD about WebSphere? It sounds defensive to me. If RPG-CGI is the way to go, then it ought to be able to stand on its own merits. Using RPG-CGI was never an option for my app. I knew before I started that there were customers that did not and would not run the app server on their production iSeries. Java and WebSphere gives us the most flexibility. As a tools vendor, we do not have the ability to dictate platform choices to our customer as a big ERP app might. We need to work with what the customer has and wants. WebSphere lets us do that. Mark _____________________________________________________________________________ Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs. _____________________________________________________________________________
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.