|
While 40 seconds seems like a lot, the IFS does not perform as well as a Windows machine. Best performance would be in the root file system, worst performance in the QDLS file system. > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Opening XL files > From: "Tim Kredlo" <TKredlo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, March 14, 2005 8:09 pm > To: <MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > List people, > > Is it typical for it to take about twice as long to open an Excel file that > resides on the IFS as it does to open the 'same' file residing on another > Windows machine on the same local network? > > 4 seconds vs. 2 seconds is not an issue, but 40 seconds vs. 20 seconds gets > to be a problem with users with a low patience level (me). > > Tim Kredlo > > > > > > > > -- > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.