|
> From: Dave Odom > > Charles & Rob, > > No, Joe's reply does not "cover"(refute) what I said; not by a long > shot. It just simply shows Joe's blind prejudice toward the dogma of > Rochester and their iSeries/AS/400 and his penchant for ignoring or > otherwise not understand the reality of the true relational world. I asked several questions. You answered none. Your sole argument is that (according to you) the rest of the world doesn't think the iSeries is relational. Feel free to offer even one factual detail as to why that is, or better yet, answer my questions. I'll repeat them: 1. Please define exactly what characteristic gives a file "depth", and how that is not supported in DB2. 2. Name a database that is relational. Identify which of the Codd rules it follows that DB2/400 does not. 3. Where don't we compete? As far as I know, DB2/400 is completely ANSI compliant. Please explain where it falls short. Unless you answer my questions with as civil a tone as I presented them, I ask you to at least exercise a modicum of self-restraint and leave my name and your personal attacks on me out of further emails. Joe
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.