|
Can you isolate the OS/400 job and run a SQL trace on that through OpsNav? That would tell you the SQL statements being executed by OS/400. Comparing those statements against the Monk SQL scripts would be a start. A question: what data type is this field? If it's float, that could be more problematic than packed or zoned. Do other fields of the same data type exhibit the problem? Sorry I can't help further, we don't have SeeBeyond. Loyd Goodbar Senior programmer/analyst BorgWarner E/TS Water Valley 662-473-5713 -----Original Message----- From: Steve Landess [mailto:sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 10:37 To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: ODBC problem??? I know that this is a long shot, but I need help in solving a problem in very complex environment. My client uses SeeBeyond EAI software (version 4.5.2) to move data between various systems. The SeeBeyond server (running Windows 2003 server) uses scripts written in a language called Monk, which uses IBM's V5R3 ODBC (v 10.00.02.00) driver to fetch and update data from the i5 520, which is running i5/OS V5R3. It is a very odd coincidence indeed that the problem I am writing about appears to have begun occuring on the day that this brand new system began operating in a production work environment after having been relocated from the client's data center in Austin, Texas to an IBM Global Services facility in Chicago. The Environment: What happens is the the EAI script sends an SQL statement for execution by the ODBC driver. I'm fairly certain that there is some SeeBeyond middleware in play here, and SeeBeyond is basically non-responsive in helping us solve the many problems we have had with their software, not to mention the company politics here!. SeeBeyond is like the big pink elephant over in the corner - everyone knows it is there, but nobody wants to acknowledge or talk about it... However, I digress. The problem: The result set that gets returned from a simple SQL select statement in the SeeBeyond Monk script has a strange value in _one_ of the numeric fields - it is changed by an order of magnitude! I _know_ that this sounds really strange, but I verified the raw data in the result set from the SeeBeyond log file and confirmed that it was wrong. It doesn't happen every time, and we haven't been able to replicate the problem in our FAT testing environment - it only occurs on the production server, so far. This field is randomly being changed, and the value is always off by a factor of 10. On numerous occasions a quantity of 1 became 10. On several occasions, a quantity of 2 became 20. On several occasions, a quantity of 3 became 30. On one highly visible occasion, a quantity of 5 became 50, and it caught notice because it would have been a $ 225,000.00 sales error! If it hadn't been caught and fixed by someone, we would have shipped 50 Dell servers to the customer instead of 5... It could very well be that a SeeBeyond component that is handling the ODBC stuff is modifying the result set before it gets handed off to the script, but at the present time, without some very technical assistance from SeeBeyond, I'm at a loss to explain the cause of the problem. (Did I say that SeeBeyond has been very difficult to deal with in solving our technical problems???). Any thoughts on a methodology to resolve this problem? Are there any known issues with IBM's ODBC driver? Anybody else out there using SeeBeyond? I tried playing around with ODBC trace and logging, and have found that this can bring the client PC to its knees when turned on. (Not to mention that it also crashed on me...) I'm fairly certain that I wouldn't be allowed to do any ODBC tracing on the production SeeBeyond server... Regards, Steve Landess Austin, Texas (512) 423-0935
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.