|
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:02:53 -0500 "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Honestly, I wouldn't mind seeing more/better iSeries > advertising, but be > careful, you've got to get your facts straight: > > >Use SQL if you want, but get even better performance > with native > programming. > > Native may perform better on iSeries than SQL on iSeries, > but that > doesn't mean native on iSeries is better than SQL on > another platform. > We've see the results on this list (or maybe ignite, or > web400, don't > recall) a small PC with SQLServer blows the doors off a > small iSeries > w/SQL. > I'd be interested in hearing the specifics about this. Such as the data load, indexes that existed on each machine, etc. I rewrote an app that previously ran MSSQL and it was fast, until it got to around 1000 records. Then it would totally die. the problem, we were dealing with millions of records that had to be moved to the PC anyhow. So I rewrote it as a native app using RPG and dynamic SQL and it outperformed the PC server 1000 to 1 easy. I think it was a little 170 as well. I know this was a few years ago.. so it wasn't one of the "optimially tuned" boxes. Permanent indexes and knowing how to build "proper" SQL statements makes all the difference. And the iSeries SQL debugger will actually make index suggestions for you.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.