× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2005

RE: SNA over IP (Anynet) Versus Native SNA

FTP used one route when we have two and SNA pegged both routes.  250 Meg
Save file via SNA was faster than 150 meg Save file via FTP.  But we have
two 128K routes and SNA used both while FTP only used one.  We have both
routes defined in the default router as a primary and secondary.  Our
routers do not do any load balancing, yet.


Chris Bipes

-----Original Message-----


I wonder what the time trial differences would be between
- FTP  of a significant save file
- SNDNETF of the same
over the local lan using *anynet?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.