|
We went from a 56k SDLC CSU/DSU to Frame Relay. We had to put in the FR for other applications so I started to use it for our SNA and disconnected the expensive 56k PTP connection. Once I change our two local machines to use *ANYNET for the remote site, I change them to use *ANYNET on the local LAN with is 100TX. I did not see a performance hit on SNA between the local machines and this was done back on V4R4. We are now on V5R1/V5R3. I do not think *ANYNET really puts much of a load on the CPU but is handled on the Ethernet adapter. New adapters cannot do the SNA any more. Chris Bipes -----Original Message----- Chris, When you switched from raw SNA to *Anynet, was it because you went from a 10/100 line to a 1gb line? If so, and you didn't see much of a difference, wouldn't that be sad? Or was this because you had the same external communications (comm line) bottleneck?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
