|
I also have avoided commenting so far, but will chime in to say that Joe is right. If you feel you must comment on the faults, you have to do so in a way that 1) Does not criticize any one person or small group. 2) Shows the business impact of the problem - added cost, added labor time, production overhead, whatever. This is not a technology statement; it is a business problem. 3) Offers a solution that benefits the company. 4) Explains how your solution benefits the company. But as others have said, before you send your comments, get your letter of recommendation. You never really can tell how your comments will be received. Another option is to send them anonymously. With that said, several others are also correct in that you have no ethical, moral, or legal obligation to a former employer. While employed, you are obligated to earn your compensation and it appears you did so. The company was obligated to compensate you for your efforts and it appears they honored that as well. You made the effort to voice your concerns when it mattered. When they terminated your employment, any obligation towards the company ended along with their obligation to you. John A. Jones, CISSP Americas Information Security Officer Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. V: +1-630-455-2787 F: +1-312-601-1782 john.jones@xxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Joe Pluta [mailto:joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 7:13 PM To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' Subject: RE: I am leaving my company - should I inform top mgmt of majorITissues? I've stayed out of this conversation to this point because it was already spinning off into the murky areas of religion and ethics, one of which is tangentially applicable to this list and the other which is pretty off-topic. But as it winds down, I'll toss in my two cents. First, as to your question, the sad truth is that there are many people who will only do something if it benefits them. This is the "Me" generation, the entitlement babies epitomized by Gordon Gekko's "Greed is Good!" in the movie Wall Street. However, there are also lots and lots of people who still do what is right just because it is right. I sense you are trying to do the latter. If that is indeed the case, I would counsel only that you carefully review your motivations. If your motivations are truly only for the good of the company, then you should be able to couch your comments in ways that are not directly harmful or spiteful to any one individual. Say that duplicate master files is a bad idea, and why, not that Mike Smith allows too many copies of the item master. Make sure you offer reasons as to why you feel a particular practice is bad, and offer an alternative solution. Carefully go over your issues. If they point to no individual and instead address systemic problems, and are presented constructively with alternate options, then I don't believe you are acting out of spite. And if they ask you to name names, point out that you're being fired yourself, and you have no desire to cause the same for someone else. Finally, recognize that even with the best of intentions, your actions may not be met with happiness and joy -- they may still be taken negatively. But if you truly feel that for the sake of your conscienceyou must speak up, then I recommend you do as I've outlined, and then walk away clear of mind and heart. And just so you know, I don't think you'll feel and better or worse one way or the other. I applaud your effort to do the right thing, but I don't think you're ethically obligated either way. This is purely your call, and I wish you luck and support you whichever direction you choose. Joe > From: j s > > Has the world come to that a person only does something helpful if > that person gains from it? -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete it. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not keep, use, disclose, copy or distribute this email without the author's prior permission. We have taken precautions to minimize the risk of transmitting software viruses, but we advise you to carry out your own virus checks on any attachment to this message. We cannot accept liability for any loss or damage caused by software viruses. The information contained in this communication may be confidential and may be subject to the attorney-client privilege. If you are the intended recipient and you do not wish to receive similar electronic messages from us in future then please respond to the sender to this effect.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.