RE: SNADS -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: SNADS
From: Chris Bipes <chris.bipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:05:27 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

We use SNADS for sending messages and spool files from one AS400 to another.
We are running *ANYNET, SNA over TCP/IP.  As far as sending other files, we
can switch to FTP.  How can one replace SNDNETMSG or SNDNETSPLF?

Chris Bipes

-----Original Message-----

I am looking for some feedback on the use of SNADS.
My understanding is that SNA may be going away.  
I am looking at a product that can do the functionality of SNADS using
TCP/IP.

My question is how much demand for a product like this exists in the
midrange market?

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: SNADS , Paul Morgan

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.