|
Joe, Thanks for the feedback. I have been pondering your points here, still digesting them, but have a few responses in the meantime: I am trying to see where the ethical sticking point is in the first comment about "selling somebody the best solution as opposed to simply making money off of whatever they choose to buy". It is not what I want, it is what the customer wants. It is the best solution FOR THEM and regardless of what I may think about their IQ levels when they choose someone else's solution, they chose the best solution for them. My job is to listen carefully to what they want and then present my solution as the best fit for their requirements. There is nothing unethical about having a flexible enough product to fit variable requirements. We provide "a solution" and, NO company has the "best" solution because that is what upgrades and enhancements are for, "bettering" the solution. The "best solution" is a constantly moving target because of changing organizational requirements and changing technology. It may be best today but tomorrow it is passé. So the best solution is a mythical beast who's characteristics are transitory at best. So all business transactions are closer to the "whatever they choose to buy" category and I don't see an ethical problem with selling solutions in that mode as long as everyone is fully informed. You'll get no argument from me that the iSeries is the most reliable, scalable, flexible, easy to manage server platform on the planet. It is the preferred platform in all cases. Perhaps I am naïve, since I am not the on responsible for sales and marketing in the organization, but I perceive that it is difficult to sell an iSeries into a WinTel shop (for example) because of the perception that the iSeries IS different than a WinTel box. Maybe not. Perhaps the perception in most DP shops is "Heck, give me whatever hardware-O/S you have, as long as it is reliable and stable, we'll learn how to operate it". I suppose that if a DP shop can overcome the limitations and difficulties of WinTel and Linux, then an iSeries should be "cake" for them. But I don't know how to reconcile the popularity of Windows and Linux with the relative obscurity of the iSeries. If the iSeries IS the "best solution", we are either pretty poor marketers and sales people, the general DP population has an average IQ below room temperature, or for "bad" reasons people continue to buy bad operating systems. There was fairly good discussion about all this after the i5 announcement(s). I really wish the iSeries was the predominate player in server arena, but it isn't. Your points about the costs of developing and supporting cross platform applications are good ones. Do you know of any publicly available statistics on that? I agree that all of those things have to be considered and I really never thought about trying to locate a successful company that has cross platform applications. I would think that DB's would fall into that category though. With the exception of MS Sequel Server, most of the major DB players are cross platform aren?t they? I wonder why they would have sought to run on multiple platforms, being platform agnostic, if it wasn't profitable for them? As it turns out, price point isn't an issue since we are an open source development company and don't charge for the software. Hmmm, now that I think about it, it is the service revenue, support subscriptions, custom programming and system integration that we charge for and those are exactly the things you say are most costly in a cross platform environment. So maybe we do have a business model to follow. Just making sure that we cover the additional costs of supporting those multiple platforms would be the thing to monitor. Still, more to think about. Tom, your points are well taken. Although the ASP environment hasn't grown as much as the early hype suggested it would, it is a good model to be evaluated. And, if I WAS running an ASP hosted service, I would want to run it on an iSeries. Peter Helgren Value Added Software, Inc 801.581.1154 x202
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.