|
Before anybody goes too far off the deep end on OS/2, let me put in my two cents. At SSA, I led the team that developed one of the first commercial client/server applications using OS/2 and the AS/400, and we loved the OS. The documentation was at times challenging (e.g., they would have the wrong return codes on APIs in the manuals), but the OS was incredible. We developed not one, but THREE different million-line plus applications which were delivered simultaneously in eight different languages, and we never ran into OS difficulties. Hardware difficulties, sure, and software design issues, but once we got things ironed out, the applications worked flawlessly. On the other hand, there were a LOT of ported Windows applications that had problems. The Windows API was crap, the 16-bit thunking was even crappier crap, and code that worked fine on Windows sometimes just didn't work on OS/2. Of course, software that worse on Windows may not work after you apply a patch, so expecting it to run flawlessly on a completely different operating system is a bit much, but OS/2 tried hard. Joe > From: pnelson@xxxxxxxxxx > > You shoulda seen all the fun we had getting the OS/2 and Code/400 combo > running in the labs..... :-((
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.