× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. November 2004

RE: Why separate pools?

> From: Alexei Pytel
> 
> With all respect... This DOES work across memory pools.
> As soon as page of a vurtual memory is addressable by machine, it does
not
> matter, which pool it is in.

I don't know about that, Alexei.  If you read the documentation on
SETOBJACC, you specify the pool to bring the object into.  It seems you
can bring the same object into multiple pools.  *PURGE will purge the
object "from all pools".

Why would you bring an object into multiple pools if one pool can access
the same object loaded in a different pool?

Maybe an IBMer can help us.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.