|
Gang, I'm interested in the same thing. I very much hope to be able to download it right away as I have a web-based to DB2/400 application I'd love to change from using the IBMDA400 to the new DB2.NET provider if its faster and turns out to be a move in the forward direction. I have a questions for whomever said: "And yes, I've used the .NET provider. Works well, although I'm not sold >the on the provider specific object types. That was something I liked about ADO, it didn't care what the underlying db was. Oh, well, >"progress". The questions is what are the "ins and outs" of that statement? What are the specific object types to which you refer? What is different from ADO? What are the upside/downsides of the new provider? Thanks, Dave Odom Arizona
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.