× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



At 09:59 11/11/2004, Art Tostaine wrote:
I'm scanning BOL's and other handwritten forms.  Most of the scanning
systems I've seen always use TIFF, which is a pain because it requires
plugins for IE.

I was using JPEG, and the file sizes were around 400-500K.

I tried TIFF, and they are 3 times that size.

Is there a reason I should use TIFF anyway?

TIFF files are lossless, meaning you will never lose any information that's in the image. JPEG allows compression, and is not lossless, unless you're using the JPEG 2000 variety, or you don't compress at all, in which case you're probably about the same as TIFF.


Here's my understanding of JPEG, which may be a little off, but it's pretty colse:

JPEG is great for images that do not have sharply defined edges (abrupt color changes), because the image format stores the current pixel color, and a number of iterations of that color, until a threshold change value is detected. Then it stores the new pixel color. The compression level determines the threshold value, and impacts both the size of the image, and the amount of loss. JPEG isn't great for text because text images contain lots of edges. It can be great for continuous tone photos though, especially if they are relatively low contrast. JPEG images that are compressed too much exhibit a ghosting effect round the edges of objects in the picture. My experience has been that you try to achieve a balance between the amount of ghosting and file size in order to arrive at the optimal compression level. I've used it mostly in situations where file size is important, and some amount of data loss is acceptable. Remember we're talking pixels here, not characters.

hth


Pete Hall
http://www.pbhall.us



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.