|
>Is there a reason I should use TIFF anyway? Are you scanning them for convenience or legal use? TIFF is a loss-less compression format, so you can claim[1] that the scan is and exact copy of the original document. On the other hand, GIF and JPG are both lossy compression schemes. GIF works much better w/long runs of the same color, while JPG handles many colors much better -- hence for documents GIF tends to be better while for photos JPG is better. If you're keeping the original documents in a box somewhere and just need to reference them online GIF sounds reasonable. If you're shredding then burning then dipping in an acid bath and then burning again the paper documents I'd get good legal advice on the admissibility of scanned images. -Walden [1] I said "claim", I didn't say the courts would listen. <G> ------------ Walden H Leverich III President & CEO Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.