× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



>Is there a reason I should use TIFF anyway?

Are you scanning them for convenience or legal use? TIFF is a loss-less
compression format, so you can claim[1] that the scan is and exact copy
of the original document. On the other hand, GIF and JPG are both lossy
compression schemes. GIF works much better w/long runs of the same
color, while JPG handles many colors much better -- hence for documents
GIF tends to be better while for photos JPG is better.  

If you're keeping the original documents in a box somewhere and just
need to reference them online GIF sounds reasonable. If you're shredding
then burning then dipping in an acid bath and then burning again the
paper documents I'd get good legal advice on the admissibility of
scanned images. 

-Walden

[1] I said "claim", I didn't say the courts would listen. <G>

------------
Walden H Leverich III
President & CEO
Tech Software
(516) 627-3800 x11
WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.TechSoftInc.com 

Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur.
(Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.)


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.