|
Hello, all: This whole discussion of "Group PTFs" begs the question, why do we need "Group PTFs" at all??? I thought the whole idea for CUMulative PTF packages was to make it easy for customers to stay current, packaging ALL of the PTFs they need in one convenient bundle that could be installed as if it is one large PTF. But, over the past few years, it seems that IBM has corrupted that concept by introducing various Group PTFs (for WebSphere, for DB2, for Java, etc.), and this really complicates our lives -- trying to figure out which ones to order, and what sequence to install them, etc. (And just try to explain all of this to a NEW iSeries customer!) Also, if I have the latest CUMe PTF package installed, do I really still need any Group PTFs? If so, why? I thought that was the whole point of CUMe packages? I was told that IBM supposedly did this (introduced Group PTFs) to reduce their costs and make it easier for customers to order only those PTFs they "need" (e.g. all PTFs for DB2 or all PTFs for Java), but in reality, since customers do not know which Group PTFs are really needed, they ended up ordering ALL of them (or all the ones they think they needed), so I suspect that IBM's actual costs to create CDs and ship them to customers were actually higher than staying with the original CUMulative PTF package concept. Also, now, with iPTFs and the ability to download the whole PTF package via the Internet, there really is NO cost for burning CDs or shipping, so that argument goes away also. Has anyone figured out a good strategy, other than to order ALL of the group PTFs that seem to apply? And, when you have to install more than one Group PTF, which one do you install first? The CUMe PTF package, then the group PTFs, or the other way around? If I order and apply ALL of the group PTFs, do I still need to order and install the latest CUMulative PTF package? And, perhaps more important, if I install the latest CUMe PTF package, do I really need to order and install ANY Group PTFs? If so, why? I mean, isn't the CUMulative PTF package supposed to contain all of the latest PTFs that I need? I think this is one area where IBM has really gone "backwards" over the past few years, under the false assumption that this was "progress" -- delivering PTFs to customers faster, etc. -- in reality, they have apparently created more problems for customers than they solved, IMHO. I think we were all far better off, and would be so again, if IBM would just get rid of the group PTFs and keep the CUMulative PTF packages more up-to-date, perhaps refreshing them monthly, since there is no longer any cost for burning all of those CDs, and shipping, etc. -- just let us download them, via the (relatively nice) iPTF process. That's just my opinion -- what do you think? Regards, Mark S. Waterbury
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.