|
Thanks Keith, that was along the lines that I was thinking of, although I was having difficulty conceptualizing a 16MB field that a BLOB could be! The other difference I just thought of is that the same DATALINK could be used by more than one record. That couldn't be done with a BLOB. Although that starts to get into some data normalization issues I suppose. Anyway, how does one choose between a BLOB and a DATALINK? I already described how I see this being used to pop up photos, drawings, and signatures in a window via an F-key. But the application that we will have is to print reports (maybe produce PDFs?) that include these graphics as well. db > -----Original Message----- > From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx / Keith Carpenter > Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 1:13 PM > > The main difference is where the data is stored. > > With a BLOB the data is considered stored in the row (record). Actually > it's probably some space object behind the scenes (there's a 16 Mb size > limit). You can think of a BLOB as a very big data field. > > With a DATALINK the data is in the IFS or some remote system and it's > referenced by URL instead. Hence why it's called a link. You > can think of > the field as containing the path to your stream file. > > A windows app could use ODBC to read your image db, then use the URL > w/access token to open the image file from the IFS. > > > Keith
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.