transaction management and performance -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: transaction management and performance
From: "kforster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <kforster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:57:05 +1000
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Priority: normal


I have a question in regard to transaction management and performance.

I have file LIB_A/FILE_A journaled to LIB_1/JRN_1 and file LIB_B/FILE_B 
journaled to LIB_2/JRN_2. 

Will it be an issue if I have a program that attempts to combine both files 
under transaction management?

Would it be better, from a performance point of view, to have both files being 
journaled be the same journal ?

Regards
Kevin

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.