RE: Message Processing

[michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hmm....maybe that's the problem.

Here's the SNDPGMMSG from the vendor's code:

SNDPGMMSG  MSG(&MESSAGE) MSGTYPE(*COMP)

Pretty vanilla...

Here's my code:

      * QMHRCVPM (Receive Program Message) API parameters
     D PmMessage       S           1024
     D PmMsgLen        S             10U 0 Inz(%Len(PmMessage))
     D PmFormat        S              8    Inz('RCVM0100')
     D PmCalStkEnt     S              4    Inz('*')
     D PmCalStkEntCnt  S             10U 0 Inz(*Zero)
     D PmMsgType       S             10    Inz('*ANY')
     D PmMsgKey        S              4    Inz(*Blanks)
     D PmWaitTime      S             10U 0 Inz(*Zero)
     D PmMsgAction     S             10    Inz('*SAME')

          //   Receive the last completion message.
          QUSBN = *Blanks;
          QUSBNB = 8;
          CallP QMHRCVPM(PmMessage      :
                         PmMsgLen       :
                         PmFormat       :
                         PmCalStkEnt    :
                         PmCalStkEntCnt :
                         PmMsgType      :
                         PmMsgKey       :
                         PmWaitTime     :
                         PmMsgAction    :
                         QUSBN);

The vendor's code is CLP, which is called by the vendor's command. I
wonder if I should call the command processing program directly?


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: Message Processing
> From: "Scott Klement" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, September 29, 2004 2:05 pm
> To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Are you accounting for the fact that another program (called 'QCMDEXC') is
> in-between the message sender and receiver?  I know QCMDEXC will propigate
> escape messages to it's caller, but I don't know about *COMP.
> 
> In fact, I don't know if I've EVER tried to receive a *COMP message.
> Maybe I have and I just can't remember it.  (that happens!)
> 
> Have you trying monkeying with which call stack entry you're sending to?
> All you say is "it's the right one".
> 
> If all else fails, there's an API that you can use to get the data out of
> the job log.  That's often the only solution.
> 
> 
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > I *think* the reason I don't like message processing is because I'm
> > stoopid. Here's my deal...PGMA calls PGMB. PGMB does a bunch of stuff,
> > but eventually sends a message to PGMA. PGMA is RPG, PGMB is a command
> > called by QCMDEXC. If I display the message details of the message I
> > want to receive (viewed through my job log), it has the correct from
> > program and to program. I want to use the QMHRCVPM (Receive Program
> > Message) API to get that message, parse it, and do something based on
> > the contents. When I make the call to QMHRCVPM, it executes but returns
> > nothing. I'm using *ANY for the message type (tried *COMP but that
> > didn't work), *EXT for the call stack entry (tried * but that didn't
> > work).
> >
> > Please...tell me what I'm doing wrong. All I can offer is the ability to
> > feel smarter than me. Not much, but it's better than a sharp stick in
> > the eye.
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.