|
Thanks Simon, I was under the mistaken impression that the calling program was throwing the MCH3601 (since that parm was defined in both the command and the CPP), but doing a MONMSG MCH3601 in the CPP works like a charm! -mark Original Message: ----------------- From: Simon Coulter shc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 23:29:05 +1000 To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Omitting retrieve values on a command On 22/09/2004, at 11:47 AM, M. Lazarus wrote: > Is there an elegant way to get around this limitation or do I have to > go into all the programs, add the parms and associated variables and > recompile? TIA. Your command processing program should be checking for NULL pointers being passed from the command analyzer and only returning values for non-NULL pointers. Regards, Simon Coulter. -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.