|
Dan Bale wrote: > A serious question: Now that you have done it, would you say that you would > have been better off just writing the RPG program? Not at all. Writing an RPG program with a display file, or a C program with simple "printf" statements, would have at best been only slightly faster, and might indeed have taken longer. Writing an RPG program with a *PNLGRP, or a C program with either a DSPF or a *PNLGRP would have almost certainly taken quite a bit longer. Besides which, (1) I now have a sample *PNLGRP application that I can use as a skeleton for future projects, (2) I've learned how to use a tool that's powerful enough that IBM generally uses it in preference to DSPFs, and (3) Having added a *PNLGRP to the product in question, I had a place where I could hang command prompt help for the product's *CMDs (a trivial exercise, but a relaxing one). -- James H. H. Lampert Professional Dilettante http://www.hb.quik.com/jamesl http://members.hostedscripts.com/antispam.html http://www.thehungersite.com Help America's Passenger Trains. http://www.saveamtrak.org Read My Lips: No More Atrocities!
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.