RE: Redundancy: Multiple 890s and multiple Shark F20

 
Hey Dennis, just sent you a reply off list (to your home address).  

---
Doug Hart
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
dennis.e.lovelady@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 6:00 PM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Redundancy: Multiple 890s and multiple Shark F20

Hello, Midrangers:

I am reviewing an iSeries implementation at a bank in South America.  In
this process, I have found an interesting anomaly I had never heard of....
and I hope that one of you good people can clarify for me.

Overview:  Two 890 systems, each connected to its own Shark F20 Storage
device.  (In other words, 2 890's and 2 F20's).  Each of these systems is
configured with BUS level mirroring.  Most of the redundancy issues seem to
have been addressed, except one.  It made sense (to me ) to recommend that
the iSeries systems have connections to BOTH F20 (with one copy of the
mirror on each F20).  So we'd have this sort of configuration (sorry for the
poor graphics.....
|---------------|
|               |
|      890      |
|               |
|               |
|---------------|
         |     \
         |      \
         |       -------\
         |               \
|---------------|    |---------------|
| SysA Mirror 1 |    | SysA Mirror 2 |
|               |    |               |
|               |    |      F20      |
|      F20      |    |               |
|               |    |               |
| SysB Mirror 2 |    | SysB Mirror 1 |
|---------------|    |---------------|
           \                  |
            \                 |
             \----------\     |
                         \    |
                     |---------------|
                     |               |
                     |      890      |
                     |               |
                     |               |
                     |---------------|

When I presented this concept, it was shot down.  The Client indicated that
they had been through this scenario with IBM; they were told that in this
configuration, if one of the F20 Shark units fails, it will bring both
iSeries systems down.
 
This surprises me greatly... which is why I'm here.  Can any of you confirm
or deny that:
    If a Shark F20 fails while connected to an iSeries, the iSeries will
also fail 
      (even if the redundant Shark is still running)
   Above being true, an EMC solution or other storage solution cannot
resolve this point
 
It seems unthinkable in this age that such an obvious single point of
failure cannot be resolved.  I'd love to hear your thoughts.
 
Regards,
--
Dennis Lovelady
--
"Television is a device that permits people who haven't anything to do to
watch people who can't do anything."
        - Fred Allen


This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.