IPDS performance - Twinax vs. TCP/IP -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: IPDS performance - Twinax vs. TCP/IP
From: Steve Morrison <smorrison@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 16:55:14 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Has anyone here used IPDS printing over both twinax connected printers and
TCP/IP connected printers?  Is there a noticeable performance difference?

I just confirmed that we can connect one of our (currently twinax connected)
IBM IPDS printers over TCP/IP, but don't have a permanent line connected to
it. Is it worth the time and effort to make this switch?

Are there other advantages to switching an existing printer to TCP/IP
connection?

Steve Morrison
Beacon Insurance
940-720-4672

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.