|
I come to the SQL well again after not knowing exactly what I'm looking for term-wise. In order to list customers by regional sales manager and have necessary relevant information, I have an SQL that joins four files together, the customer master being the primary table. It works well. Fast as ... heck. Anyway, this SQL result set will be the basis for further information gathering, i.e., sales history, forecasts, etc, for several applications. I would like this "base" SQL to be "invisible", like I envision DDS join logical files where the join logic is defined in the file definition; when I read the file, I don't worry about it being the same join logic in different programs that use it. Whereas, with SQL, if I add the Sales History to the SQL statement, I seem to think there's a risk of introducing a relationship that changes the join logic. I don't know if this makes sense. Don't know if I'm looking at creating an SQL view, then using that in another SQL statement. Or subquery. Or just adding to the existing "base" SQL. I would just like to have an idea of the best way to design it, so that it's flexible for future use. tia, db
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.