|
As far as the exits go and being able to set the identity that the job will execute under, the FTP server is the most flexible. The logon exit is called prior the OS validating the supplied credentials. I can't remember but I think this is the case for TFPT and for REXEC. Because of the need for supporting the Anonymous user, the exit allows you to set the jobs identity to your choosing. For all of the host servers (Database, Data Queue, Remote Command...) your signon is validated before the exit is called and they don't have a return parameter to set the identity. You can however do a swap. NetServer falls into the host server category above but is more of a pain in the ass because the server does not own the socket is using to communicate with. For Telnet, the exit fires prior to the user ever being presented a screen so you won't be able to prompt them for their secret. You can't do a swap because this exit is called from one of the Telnet jobs. For telnet your best option is to either create a routing program or an initial program that you can do your extra prompting in. These are also the only way to support what you want from a dumb terminal. You do have some other things that you have to control - System Request menu and Attention menu access. -----Original Message----- From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jared Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 9:25 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: RE: Replacing the AS400 signon manager? > In order to get a clear idea of what you want, can you please provide > three scenarios of what your users should see? Describe telnet, FTP > and iSeries file transfer, and that might be enough for a reasonably > full response (perhaps close to what's reasonable as "full".) I really don't want the client software to change at all, in look and feel or underlying code. But for some users, I want the "password" entered at the prompt to be characters that prove they know a secret that isn't the password stored with their AS400 user profile. On the server, I want that info passed into an exit program that talks to a secret-verifying service, determines whether to allow the signon, and continues the session under whatever user profile I want to map onto the username. So the out of band communication doesn't involve the client, just more server-side code that knows what to do with the non-standard auth strings. Is this only possible when logging in via some channels and not others? -Jared -- This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.