Re: Replacing the AS400 signon manager? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Replacing the AS400 signon manager?
From: "James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

> What "very strong authentication" may mean can differ from one to
> another.  For example, how would one stop and prompt for a retinal scan
> during the middle of a ftp session, versus during the middle of a 5250
> signon?

Besides, retinal scans can be faked. And you don't even need to do that
total-gross-out bit from "Never Say Never Again," either. After all, it's
just another data stream. Just record the retinal scan, and play it back.

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.