× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'm trying to capture display file images with "real" data for
documentation.  My results are lousy: the JPG images, when pasted into a
Word document, look pasty (slightly fuzzy) even though they're 200K or more.

 

Client Access uses the IBM3270 font (8 x 18).  I'm using both ScreenPrint
Platinum 4.8 and SnagIt 7 to capture the images: they're both good products,
although SnagIt appears to have more tools.  I'm not using progressive
encoding on ScreenPrint.

 

The images seem to be sharper when I go to monochrome and reverse color.
The Client Access color scheme is the standard black background, and I
wonder if this isn't causing the problem.  I'm not planning on printing the
document, so I don't have to worry about black toner.

 

Does anybody have any suggestions for CAX/ScreenPrint/SnagIt settings?  Or
this there a better product/approach to this task?

 

Thanks,

Reeve

 

 


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.