Re: IASP, HA and development

[Wim <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Evan and Al,

Thanks for replying.

The main thing for using iasp'S would be to keep our developers from 
touching data on the other asp. The main idea is to create some sort of 
lpar envioronment without the lpar overhead and costs.

What time frame are we looking at if we want to create this setup.

Currently we have a lot of jobdescriptions, susbsystems, hardcoded 
library names and so on. However, we are currently in the process of 
cleaning up al qualified things.

Thanks again for replying.

Best Regards,

Wim Jongman






Evan Harris wrote:

> Hi Wim
>
> I forgot to mention:
>
> the original HTTP server does not support access to IASP's so if your 
> doing eRPG on the original HTTP server you will need to have your 
> programs in *SYSBAS and update them to include a SETASPGRP command in 
> their *INZSR or similar so they can get to the data out in the IASP.
>
> Cheers
> Evan Harris
>
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We want to create a mirrored machine with Vision and we want to 
> > develop on this machine. However, for the development machine we need 
> > some production libraries to compile and test against that are also 
> > on the the production machine.
> >
> > We want to create the libraries with the same name but in different 
> > IASP's.
> >
> > I have read some of the older threads, but I wonder if there are any 
> > new insights. What needs to be changed the most if we take the IASP 
> > approach?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Wim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
> list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.