Re: OT: Inappropriate email

See if the SMEX software was written in the US or UK.  Try spelling it as 
arse-u-me !  ;-)

...Neil




"Jeff Crosby" <jlcrosby@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent by: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
2004/03/18 08:41



To
"'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc

Subject
OT: Inappropriate email






I got the following email in response to the post I sent, to this list, 
just
a while ago (see original post below):

<emailIreceived>

"Trend SMEX Content Filter has detected sensitive content.

Place = 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'; ; ; Midrange Systems
Technical Discussion Sender = Jeff Crosby Subject = Direct remote access 
vs
over the internet Delivery Time = March 18, 2004 (Thursday) 07:39:41 
Policy
= Dirty Words Action on this mail = Quarantine message

Warning message from administrator:
The Orvis Email server has detected language content which has been
previously associated with a computer virus. Contact the Orvis Help Desk 
at
540-983-4261 for assistance, and / or remove any potential offensive
language and re-send."

</emailIreceived>

I assume it was because of the way I wrote the word "assume" with dashes 
in
it.  I removed the dashes this time.  We'll see if I get the above email
again.

This is the first I have ever received an email telling me an email I sent
was inappropriate.  Due to dirty language that is. <g>  Is this a common
theme now?

-- 
Jeff Crosby
Dilgard Frozen Foods, Inc.
P.O. Box 13369
Ft. Wayne, IN 46868-3369
260-422-7531

The opinions expressed are my own and not necessarily the opinion of my
company.  Unless I say so.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Crosby
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:36 AM
> To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
> Subject: Direct remote access vs over the internet
> 
> Our old Axcess/400 protocol converter finally gave up the 
> ghost yesterday.
> RIP.
> 
> We have a VPN whereby we can dial in and get a sign on screen 
> remotely over the internet using Mochasoft or Client Access 
> (oops, I mean iSeries Access).
> 
> My question is:  Is there still value in being able to dial 
> in directly bypassing the internet?  I.E. if you ain't 
> calling in over the public internet, you can't be sniffed. 
> Do some of you still do that?  I assume that with a Cisco 
> PIX and router it could be done here.  The phone extensions 
> are still available.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --