RE: Disabling Qinter... (Follow up question)

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

As usual, RTFM to the rescue - the Work Management book seems to support 
this idea of the last SBS. Here's a relevant bit:

If the device is varied on and has been allocated by another subsystem and 
is at
the Sign-On display (the Sign-On display was displayed before the second
subsystem was started), a second subsystem can allocate the device from the
first subsystem and display the Sign-On display.

The rest of that manual has much more on this topic and is actually quite 
clear.   ;-)

HTH
Vern

At 05:25 PM 3/7/2004 -0500, you wrote:
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> | [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of jt
> | Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 8:43 PM
> | To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> | Subject: RE: Disabling Qinter... (Follow up question)
> |
> |
> | (Except the first SBS to
> | allocate a
> | DEV should always get the lock, afaik...  Dunno how multiple cores handle
> | task dispatching, of course.)
>
> Wrote the above before I saw the below.  My recollection is vague, and Could
> Very Well Be the Last SBS to allocate the DEV gets it.  Can't remember for
> certain, and even if I had a system to test on I dunno if I would, in this
> case.  (At any rate, mutually exclusive WrkStn name and type Entries are the
> solution, as beens noted.)  My recollection, after reading this, is that
> this is how you can switch a set of terminals from one subsys to another:
> Start the second and when the user's signoff then it gets switched to the
> other subsys.