You make an excellent point regarding using the allocation attempt versus
the subsystem start as the point of conflict.  My understanding has always
been that the last allocation attempt takes precedence and determines the
"winner" when multiple subsystems are trying to allocate a device.  My
memory may be faulty and I don't have the ability to test right now, but
that's what I remember.

Andy Nolen-Parkhouse

> On Behalf Of Tom Liotta
> Subject: RE: Disabling Qinter... (Follow up question)
> Since SBS2 has only the single device in its table, it almost certainly
> will be able to get it allocated before SBS1 has the time to get around to
> it. So even though SBS2 "started" last, it wins.
> If somebody really knows how it works, it might be instructive to the rest
> of us.
> Tom Liotta

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2022 by and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.