|
Pat, By modern I was not referring to block mode. What I was saying was that we used to design according to poor performance - that being caused by block mode. Now we have fewer performance issues, we can stop designing for (lack of) performance, and design according to contemporary User Interface design principles - what I would call "modern" design. Trevor ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat Barber" Subject: Re: 24 x 80 is too small. > Have you found a "newer" or more "modern" way to use screens > other than "block mode" ???? > > I been designing screens for a pretty good while and I don't recall IBM > dropping the "block mode" of processing screen data. > > > trevor perry wrote: > > > > The "problem" with 24x80 was that the block mode performance of the S/38 and > > AS/400 was slow.. Since performance has been improved so much these days, we > > have an opportunity to design applications to a more modern standard. That > > means designing better screens, with better groups of data, more efficient > > workflow, etc.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.