|
And then you put in switches or you break it into subnets and route them... Twinax is a fine physical protocol for what it does...LU6.2 and LU7 and PU2.1 are great too...TCP/IP and Ethernet is not the best...just the most widely used. M$ Windows isn't the best OS, it's the most widely used. On Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:22:00 -0500, "Jim Franz" <franz400@xxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > <you wrote>I'm surprised that some LANS don't > just fall down on their knees. > > they do.. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Barber" <mboceanside@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:59 PM > Subject: Re: Max Devices on ethernet adapters > > > > Yep... I sort of thought that the "pain method" was the most > > common method. The tools to watch this load leveling just > > don't seem to be there. With so many folks telling me all > > about the "joys" of ethernet, I got to wondering if they > > really knew about how large volumes of date(1,100 LPM Printers) > > would be on that line. > > > > I fully understand adapter speeds and that impact, but just > > because the adapter is "faster than a speedimg bullet" does > > not mean that the user isn't seeing speed reductions. > > > > With the never ending source of large files going back and forth > > between pc's and the 400, I'm surprised that some LANS don't > > just fall down on their knees. A ethernet adapter handling pc's > > running emulation is one thing, but all these FTP things I hear > > about must be killing these networks. > > > > > > > > > > Andy Nolen-Parkhouse wrote: > > > > > Pat, > > > > > > It's probably better to think in terms of throughput than actual numbers > of > > > devices. Your telnet devices are going to send their requests to an IP > > > address and the adapter will receive them. The AS/400 will send > responses > > > (or print streams or file transfers) out to the network and the network > will > > > route them to the appropriate device. So things aren't really attached > in > > > the traditional sense of the word. > > > > > > When your peak throughput load approaches or starts to exceed the rated > > > throughput of your adapter it is time to consider an additional adapter. > So > > > yes, I believe you just keep adding them until it hurts. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Andy Nolen-Parkhouse > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing > list > > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing > list > To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, > visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l > or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives > at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. > -- michaelr_41@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.