|
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 13:42, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Question, would purchasing one additional drive of the largest size be > cheaper than trying to solve this problem otherwise? And both achieve > basically the same results? Or is having the system down to do an ipl a > zero cost? is your question directed at me? if you're suggesting that the cure to the memory leak issues that cause the unprotected storage to increase over time is to buy more DASD, I have to ask... are you working for IBM??? <VBG> IPLs clear this up. So does spending a fair amount of time taking servers down one by one to discover the latest cause... down servers vs. IPL??? It takes most of my clients less time to IPL for a PTF apply than it does to call me and have me poke around in their system every couple of days to clear that storage. -- "Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same." -- Oscar Wilde
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.