|
OK, I hear this all the time on the list: "Programmers should not have access to production data (or even the production system)." This sounds great in theory, but how does it work in practice? How is system administration handled without "dedicated" system adminstrators versus developers? Assume a small shop with two - three iSeries folks. I can fill in some blanks, but what about others? * Use source control to manage object moves from development to production. * Use backup software such as Tivoli or BRMS. How are the following handled in a "do not touch" production system? * Applying PTFs or vendor software updates? * Allowing third party vendors to "dial-in" and maintain their software? * Duplication live production data for use in test/development, so the development system feels "real"? I've only worked in small shops thus far, but I understand the need for segregated control. Our current internal auditors are clamoring for this, but do not offer any advice on REAL system administration, only "you shouldn't be able to do this, that, and those other things." Thanks, Loyd -- Mediocrity: It takes a lot less time and most people won't notice the difference until it's too late. <http://www.despair.com/> loyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ICQ#504581 http://www.blackrobes.net/
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.