RE: Add libraries to QSYSLIBL or QUSRLIBL

>So I started thinking about adding them instead to the QSYSLIBL.
Currently,
>our QSYSLIBL is still using the default IBM provided QSYS, QSYS2, QHLPSYS,
>and QUSRSYS.

>But I'm wondering how appropriate that would be.  Are there any gotcha's if
>I do this?

The one that is most likely to bite you is, if you get a new version of the
libraries and you want to set up a test environment to check it out, you
would need to do some fiddling to remove the old version from the SYSLIBL.
Nothing a little CL couldn't solve, but it's still a nuisance.

Other gotchas are unpredictable. We put one of our purchased packages into
SYSLIBL, then found that the fact that its library contained a file called
QCLSRC was causing us problems. Who would have guessed that?

PC2