RE: Performance issue - CLRLIB vs RNMOBJ vs DLTLIB / Timeslice

>From what I've been reading the answer to that question can be no.

As I understand it, it depends on how your DASD is configured.

If you're saving to a save file in the same ASP as the library being saved
and all the ASP's disks are on the same controller ; then you could actually
see a faster save to tape than the save to save file.


Charles

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Landess [mailto:sjl_123@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:56 AM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Re: Performance issue - CLRLIB vs RNMOBJ vs DLTLIB / 
> Timeslice
> 
> 
> > Eric wrote:
> > As to why tape can be faster, depending on your storage 
> controller, your
> > tape subsystem can restore the access path faster than the 
> system can
> > rebuild it.  I'm not really an expert on the new hardware, 
> so I can't
> > comment more.
> 
> Eric,
> Wouldn't saving each library to a save file and restoring 
> from there be
> even faster than tape?
> 
> {given that there is enough auxiliary storage capacity to 
> hold the save
> file(s)}?
> 
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion 
> (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>