|
I'd guess so, as long as you don't use compression.... Eric DeLong Sally Beauty Company MIS-Project Manager (BSG) 940-898-7863 or ext. 1863 -----Original Message----- From: Steve Landess [mailto:sjl_123@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:56 AM To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion Subject: Re: Performance issue - CLRLIB vs RNMOBJ vs DLTLIB / Timeslice > Eric wrote: > As to why tape can be faster, depending on your storage controller, your > tape subsystem can restore the access path faster than the system can > rebuild it. I'm not really an expert on the new hardware, so I can't > comment more. Eric, Wouldn't saving each library to a save file and restoring from there be even faster than tape? {given that there is enough auxiliary storage capacity to hold the save file(s)}? Steve _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
