RE: Performance issue - CLRLIB vs RNMOBJ vs DLTLIB / Timeslice

["DeLong, Eric" <EDeLong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I'd guess so, as long as you don't use compression....  

Eric DeLong
Sally Beauty Company
MIS-Project Manager (BSG)
940-898-7863 or ext. 1863



-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Landess [mailto:sjl_123@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:56 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Performance issue - CLRLIB vs RNMOBJ vs DLTLIB / Timeslice


> Eric wrote:
> As to why tape can be faster, depending on your storage controller, your
> tape subsystem can restore the access path faster than the system can
> rebuild it.  I'm not really an expert on the new hardware, so I can't
> comment more.

Eric,
Wouldn't saving each library to a save file and restoring from there be
even faster than tape?

{given that there is enough auxiliary storage capacity to hold the save
file(s)}?

Steve
_______________________________________________
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.