× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



The equivalent would be:
 
Select TABLE_NAME
From SYSIBM.SQLTABLES
Where TABLE_SCEM=?
and ?=? (I'm not sure which "type" field is relevant)
Order By TABLE_NAME
 
If your collection was created using the SQL "create collection" statement, it 
will have (amongst others) a SYSTABLES table. The equivalent query there would 
be:
 
Select TABLE_NAME
From collection.SYSTABLES
Where TABLE_SCHEMA=?
and ?=? (Might it be "FILE_TYPE"?)
Order By TABLE_NAME
 
You can always go straight to the based-on physical for this logical, 
QSYS.QADBXREF, but the field names all change again.
 
As far as why they table and column names are different from what your 
expecting, I know not, but it kinda looks like someone may have assigned 
aliases to shorten the SQL standard column names.
 
Regards,
Zak Metz

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Urbanek, Marty [mailto:Marty_Urbanek@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
        Sent: Thu 1/8/2004 1:33 PM 
        To: 'midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx' 
        Cc: 
        Subject: DB2 SQL, SYSCAT, SYSIBM, etc
        
        

        We have some SQL that runs a query via JDBC such as:
        
        SELECT TABNAME FROM SYSCAT.TABLES WHERE TABSCHEMA = ? AND TYPE = ? 
ORDER BY
        TABNAME
        
        The ? marks are replaced before running it.
        
        This works on other DB2s but does not appear to work on iSeries V5R2.
        
        After searching the midrange-l archives, V5R2 info center, and 
newsgroups, I
        am still confused. I see some things that imply that SYSCAT.TABLES 
should
        work on iSeries, but others that imply that (at least) syntax changes 
will
        be necessary, such as:
        
        SYSCAT -> SYSIBM
        TABNAME -> TABLE_NAME
        TABSCHEMA -> TABLE_SCHEMA
        
        Am I understanding this correctly? Is there an easier way? If we change 
the
        query syntax for iSeries, will there still be other subtle differences 
that
        will cause problems?
        
        THANKS in advance!
        -Marty
        _______________________________________________
        This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing 
list
        To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
        visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
        or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
        Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
        at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l. 
  
NOTICE: This E-mail may contain confidential information. If you are not 
the addressee or the intended recipient please do not read this E-mail 
and please immediately delete this e-mail message and any attachments 
from your workstation or network mail system. If you are the addressee 
or the intended recipient and you save or print a copy of this E-mail, 
please place it in an appropriate file, depending on whether 
confidential information is contained in the message. 
 
 

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.