|
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:42:57PM -0800, James H. H. Lampert wrote: > I've long suspected that IBM's refusal to make certain network-related > functions accessible from the command line or from anything > terminal-based is really just a way to violently shove one more piece of > bloatware, i.e., Client Access (which is actually two pieces of > bloatware: both the client and the server are unnecessarily bulky) down > the throats of their users. Come to think of it, three pieces, unless > OpsConsole/OpsNav are available for DOS, Macintosh, or Linux. No, they're not. Therefore, you must have at least one Windows box. (I haven't tried them under WINE, but I suspect they do not work.) I truly don't understand why they place such a requirement on top of such a notoriously brittle platform as Windows. As an old mainframe systems programmer, I'm appalled at the master console being anything but a dumb green screen, at least as an option.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.