× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. October 2003

Re: XP vs Win2000 Pro

>  However I've been given the option of remaining on Win2000 Pro.
If you can convince the powers that be to put you on NT 4.0, that would
be the best choice. Failing that, I would prefer 2000 over XP.

My Windoze box at work is still on NT 4.0, and I've made it quite clear
that not only am I not the least bit interested in an XP box, but that I
would consider having one shoved down my throat to be grounds for me to
quit on the spot.

My own pair of vintage 486 notebooks, BTW, run IBM PC-DOS 2000. With no
Windoze whatsoever. And my Macintosh is still on MacOS 8.

And at any rate, remember: XP is loaded with Microsloth spyware. What
"XP" really stands for is "cross out your privacy."

--
JHHL

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.