|
While I _DO_ believe you could secure a single iSeries partition appropriately for HIPAA requirements, I think it's _much_ easier not to. Let's face it, the big fear of HIPAA is an audit. If some not-so-technical[1] federal agent comes in an audits your system would you rather say: "Here is our system. We run production and development on the same machine. Our developers have access to the same machine as our production users. Sure, we've properly implemented object-level-security and auditing. What? You don't know what object-level-security is? Let me explain..." I'll promise that all he heard was "our developers have access to the same machine" Or would you like to say: "We have two machines, one for development and one for production. Our developers do not have any access what so ever to production. We've also implemented object-level-security and auditing as additional precautions." I'll promise that all he heard was "our developers do not have access" -Walden [1] Be careful, the no-so-technical guy has access to some _very_ technical people if he smells blood. ------------ Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) -----Original Message----- From: Steve Johnson [mailto:sjohnson@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 10:27 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Test Development System Survey (HIPAA) I went back to the archives to search for this discussion that I recalled reading (it was from July 2003 titled "Test Development System Survey")... <clip> We are currently using our AS400 production box for development as well (the test/production systems are separated by logins/environment variables). How many of you all also combine both on one machine, and has this caused performance problems for you? Or do you use a test machine for development specifically because of this (or wish you had one)? <clip> We also have one iSeries partition housing all of our environments (Lawson HCM). I'm starting to hear news that we will be moving our dev/test environments to a separate partition due to HIPAA requirements. Has anyone else started to hear the same, or already acted on HIPAA requirements by splitting environments yet? Any tips/benefits/drawbacks for having Lawson 7.2.2.6 Prod/Dev environments on separate iSeries partitions? I saw a couple of strings in the archives that mentioned HIPAA requirements, but they didn't appear to focus on the issue of splitting Prod/Dev/Test environments in order to comply with the extensive set of privacy/security standards that are defined by HIPAA. I don't want to resurrect the original discussion as to which methodology is better... However, as a sidebar, I would like to know if anyone has been able to tie Osama Bin Laden or Al-Qaida to the creation of the HIPAA requirements. <grin> Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.