|
> If they are writing it in Java, why couldn't they do it on all platforms. > That is the point of their Eclipse platform. Even if they write it in C, > they can still do it. Except that when you add the WDSc plugins to Eclipse, you find out that not only are the WDSc portions not open source, but they also call Windows DLLs as backends, and therefore it only runs on Windows. I can compile and run Eclipse on FreeBSD, but I can't use the iSeries stuff, which is all I really want Eclipse for, anyway. > Don't go too hard on them. It is first release. Bear in mind that I'm one of the developers of the open-source TN5250 that Buck was referring to... Don't be too shocked if I tout it's advantages over IBM's stuff. :) > It's a nice proof of concept that they are going to support non Windows > PCs. Again, give them time, it is apparently first release. I am sure > they want to test the waters before they throw more development into it. I'm glad they're working on diversifying, so that they don't have to force everyone to run Windows. But, the difference between running things on Debian vs. RedHat is largely just a recompile. The difference between FreeBSD vs. Linux is largely just a recompile. Mac OS X was based on FreeBSD, and again is largely just a recompile. If the source were available, the "first release" would've been available to everyone instead of just Linux (possibly just RedHat!) users. It's something to think about.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.