|
I understand what you're saying. But for almost the past decade, IBM has had a severe aversion to battling MS on MS's terms. The last time we tried that was with OS/2, and few execs in this company want that to happen again! (Another symptom of that is an aversion to selling Linux as a workstation solution, leaving the desktop market to MS. Some of us here would indeed like to see at least some effort to push Linux on the desktop.)
Any way you cut it, the iSeries seems to get almost no ad exposure in the USA. Trade rags are probably very effective, but if it's also effective to advertise a pSeries to the general public, then the iSeries should have equal time.
I see your point since the two machines use virtually the same hardware. But they do come with different software targetted to different sets of customers. The pSeries is marketed as a low-cost Unix machine, and the iSeries is marketed as an enterprise solution. Each market segment needs different treatment.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.