RE: SQL date comparison - a better way? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: SQL date comparison - a better way?
From: "Chevalier, Rick" <Rick.Chevalier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:02:29 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>,<mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I have tried both of the previous suggestions without success.  Removing my
library from the create function causes it to be created in QGPL.  I did
have the incorrect number of parameters but correcting that didn't correct
the problem.

I can see the function in SYSFUNCTS so I know it's getting there.  As far as
I can tell everything is correct for the entry.

Rick

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: SQL date comparison - a better way? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.