|
Use a cursor -----Original Message----- From: E Doc [mailto:doc6502@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 6:53 AM To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Row locks in DB2/400 UDB All Is there a way to lock a row in DB2/400 UDB SQL without using commitment control? We have a table that holds the 'next sequence number'. Whenever several processes access the table, we end up with a scenario like: program A accesses the table and grabs the next counter number (counter number = 50) program B accesses the table and grabs the next counter number (counter number = 50) program B adds one to the counter number, and updates the table (counter number = 51) program A adds one to the counter number, and updates the table (counter number = 51) Now, there are two transactions with an identical sequence number. We're doing a simple select to fetch the sequence number, and we are not using commitment control. Any suggestions? Thanks -Doc _______________________________________________ This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.