Re: Manipulation of system portion of the thread's library list.

[Vern Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jorge

I'm still curious about the benefit of putting your library below QSYS. If 
it does not have anything of the same name as QSYS, it does not matter. If 
it does, it shouldn't - it does not get used anyway, unless specifically 
qualified, right? And, as others have suggested, the system portion is 
intended to be fairly static - the user portion is more the changeable 
part. We add a common library to the top of the system portion for compiles 
(to hold includes that are in error in QSYSINC) but that's all - we would 
not do that if IBM did not have occasional bad include members (like /COPY).

You might be better off using the current library - CHGCURLIB.

All you need is more advice, right?  ;-)

Cheers

Vern

At 01:30 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, you wrote:




> Barbara,
>
> Thanks for your clarification in regard to the PRODUCT libraries.
>
> After much thinking and consideration I have to accept the fact
> that System Libraries below QSYS being removed cannot be
> placed back and retain the original System Library list sequence.
>
> I wish this situation could change in future releases.
>
> After all the AS400 is a great machine and can me customized
> at the customer's needs.
>
> Thanks to everyone for the contributions and opinions.
>
> Jorge Moreno