×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Jorge
I'm still curious about the benefit of putting your library below QSYS. If
it does not have anything of the same name as QSYS, it does not matter. If
it does, it shouldn't - it does not get used anyway, unless specifically
qualified, right? And, as others have suggested, the system portion is
intended to be fairly static - the user portion is more the changeable
part. We add a common library to the top of the system portion for compiles
(to hold includes that are in error in QSYSINC) but that's all - we would
not do that if IBM did not have occasional bad include members (like /COPY).
You might be better off using the current library - CHGCURLIB.
All you need is more advice, right? ;-)
Cheers
Vern
At 01:30 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Barbara,
Thanks for your clarification in regard to the PRODUCT libraries.
After much thinking and consideration I have to accept the fact
that System Libraries below QSYS being removed cannot be
placed back and retain the original System Library list sequence.
I wish this situation could change in future releases.
After all the AS400 is a great machine and can me customized
at the customer's needs.
Thanks to everyone for the contributions and opinions.
Jorge Moreno
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
